Loto: AI prediction and backtest – what are "statistical" lines worth?

Two honest experiments on the real draws: we compare random Quick Pick lines with "hot" lines built from the most frequent numbers, and we let a learning algorithm (k nearest neighbours) predict each draw, always using only the data known before the draw. Both methods are compared with the exact expectation of pure chance.

Backtest: Quick Pick lines vs hot lines (12 months)

For each of the 157 draws from 15.10.2025 to 14.10.2026, each group plays 10 lines: random Quick Pick versus lines built from the 15 most drawn numbers over the previous 100 draws. The Lucky number (Chance) are random in both groups so that only the main numbers are compared. 1,570 lines per group in total.

MatchesQuick PickHotExpected by chance
0926887894.1
1525581558.8
211594109.0
3487.8
4000.2
5000.0

Wins by tier

TierMatchesQuick PickHotExpected by chance
15 Matches + Lucky number (Chance)000.00
25 Matches000.00
34 Matches + Lucky number (Chance)000.02
44 Matches000.16
53 Matches + Lucky number (Chance)100.78
63 Matches387.01
72 Matches + Lucky number (Chance)111410.90
82 Matches1048098.14
90–1 Matches + Lucky number (Chance)139124145.30

Result: the difference between the two groups is not statistically significant (chi² = 7.12, p = 0.068). It stays within what pure chance produces for a sample of this size.

AI prediction (k nearest neighbours)

For each draw, the model looks for the 7 past moments whose preceding 3 draws most resembled the current ones and plays the numbers most often drawn next. It is reapplied after every draw and never sees the future. 300 draws evaluated from 16.11.2024 to 14.10.2026.

Matches per prediction

ObservedExpected
0 Matches180 / 170.9
1 Matches98 / 106.8
2 Matches20 / 20.8
3 Matches2 / 1.5
4 Matches0 / 0.0
5 Matches0 / 0.0

Average: 0.480 matches per prediction – chance gives 0.510.

Deviation from the expectation of chance: chi² = 1.22, p = 0.544. The model hits exactly as often as numbers picked at random.

Model line for the next draw

78153437

For entertainment only: this line has exactly the same chance as any other.

Latest predictions

DatePredictionMatches
14.10.2026 310263138 0
12.10.2026 610152930 0
10.10.2026 56183739 0
07.10.2026 516213249 0
05.10.2026 2329323841 0
03.10.2026 715293239 0
30.09.2026 415212441 0
28.09.2026 1831373948 1
26.09.2026 912182346 1
23.09.2026 35183235 0
21.09.2026 418234149 0
19.09.2026 1015161728 0
16.09.2026 2427363843 0
14.09.2026 1332374148 1
12.09.2026 818313738 1
09.09.2026 45303241 1
05.09.2026 1723303145 1
02.09.2026 426333536 0
31.08.2026 518212437 0
29.08.2026 1517213140 1
26.08.2026 16101719 1
24.08.2026 835384148 1
22.08.2026 215203049 0
19.08.2026 1624253846 0
17.08.2026 1013242830 1
15.08.2026 1012152139 0
12.08.2026 123273239 0
10.08.2026 713364749 0
08.08.2026 410173141 1
05.08.2026 810151819 0
03.08.2026 1316213638 0
01.08.2026 45182341 1
29.07.2026 1323274548 1
27.07.2026 34131621 1
25.07.2026 1231344849 0
22.07.2026 1618213142 0
18.07.2026 1316212630 0
15.07.2026 1016173841 0

How it works

A nearest-neighbour model looks for points in time whose last draws resembled the current ones and picks the numbers that followed most often. It is reapplied draw by draw without looking into the future; a backtest additionally compares Quick Picks with lines made of frequent numbers.

Example

For 5 from 49, 0.5 matches per line are expected on average; the model lands exactly there.

Limitations

No model can predict random draws. The page shows this transparently with a chi-squared test.

Frequently asked questions about this tool

Can AI predict lottery numbers?
No. With independent, uniformly distributed draws there is no pattern a model could learn.
▲